Discussion:
Tufts University: We Hate and Discriminate Against Christians, Because We are Freemason Satanist "universalist" Witches and We Think We Can Get Away With It
(too old to reply)
Michael JONES
2012-10-22 23:19:30 UTC
Permalink
Tufts University is, and always has been, a 3rd tier college where not
much of any significance has ever happened. It was founded and is
still run by Freemason homosexual child molesters, witches, and bigots
from the lunatic, apostate, heretical, so-called "universalist
church", which translates simply into the Freemasonic Church of Satan
that Freemason criminal trash use to as a cover for their satanic
practices. These evil witches and freemasons love to molest children
at their Freemason satanist lodges, which is probably why they are so
bigoted against real Christians, and think they can get away with
criminal acts of discrimination and bigotry.

The Freemason satanists who run Tufts, and who send their rat-bag
degenerate children to attend this Z-grade witches' cauldron of
mediocrity, have actually attempted to BAN a Christian student group
from receiving funding from this has-been dump of a college.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/university-bans-christian-group-requiring-leaders-adhere-basic-biblical-truths-christianity_655220.html

Did these freemason satanist witches ban any Jewish groups? No, of
course not! Tufts Jewish Hillel: http://www.tuftshillel.org/index.asp
Did they ban any Muslim groups? No! Tufts Muslim Students Association:
http://ase.tufts.edu/msat/about.aspx
Did they ban any Hindu groups? No! Tufts Hindu Students Council:
http://ase.tufts.edu/hsc/
Did they ban any groups that worship the "god" of the "universalist
church" Satan? Why no! It's the TUFTS BEELZEBUBS! : http://bubs.com/news/
Did they ban ANY other religious groups besides this Christian group?
NO!!!

Remember - these are FREEMASON SCUM WHO HATE GOD, the same group that
has members like JERRY SANDUSKY and ANDERS BEHRING BREIVIK THE
NORWEGIAN CHILD MURDERER. The only people Freemason satanists HATE so
much that they would BAN THEM are REAL CHRISTIANS!

Do you still wonder if Freemasons and "universalist" frauds are
anything other than CHILD-RAPING FREEMASON SATANIST CRIMINAL HERETICAL
SCUM BIGOTS, JUST LIKE THEIR FREEMASON LODGE BROTHER JERRY SANDUSKY?

This University, the child-raping freemason SCUM that run it, and the
bigoted children of these Freemason satanist criminals who comprise
the "student government" there, NEED TO BE SUED INTO OBLIVION. And if
that doesn't work THIS HAS-BEEN 3rd TIER DUMP OF A UNIVERSITY NEEDS TO
BE OCCUPIED BY ARMED CHRISTIAN SOLDIERS WHO ARE READY TO FIGHT FOR
THEIR RIGHTS AGAINST SATANIC FREEMASON SCUMBAGS and "universalist"
WITCHES.

These freemason "universalist" scum need to be DESTROYED
Tom Swift Sr.
2012-10-24 00:03:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael JONES
Tufts University is, and always has been, a 3rd tier college where not
much of any significance has ever happened. It was founded and is
still run by Freemason homosexual child molesters, witches, and bigots
from the lunatic, apostate, heretical, so-called "universalist
church", which translates simply into the Freemasonic Church of Satan
that Freemason criminal trash use to as a cover for their satanic
practices. These evil witches and freemasons love to molest children
at their Freemason satanist lodges, which is probably why they are so
bigoted against real Christians, and think they can get away with
criminal acts of discrimination and bigotry.
The Freemason satanists who run Tufts, and who send their rat-bag
degenerate children to attend this Z-grade witches' cauldron of
mediocrity, have actually attempted to BAN a Christian student group
from receiving funding from this has-been dump of a college.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/university-bans-christian-group-r...
Well, ignoring the "Freemasons" ranting and raving, let's discuss
the real facts about what *actually* occured at Tufts University.

The group was NOT banned. This is a LIE. It can continue to exist
and does as it wished.

However because of it's discriminatory clauses in its constitution,
it
will no longer be *recognized* by the Student Goverment at Tufts.

"The Weekly Standard's" use of the word *banned* was clearly chosen
to
emotionally *manipulated* it's readers' opinions --- which it clearly
did
with Michael JONES

Now let's get the full facts, from Tuft University's own newspaper:

------------
http://www.tuftsdaily.com/tcf-loses-official-tcuj-recognition-plans-t...


"TCF Loses Official TCUJ Recognition, Plans to Appeal"
by Martha Shanahan
Published: Monday, October 22, 2012

Tufts Christian Fellowship (TCF) has lost its official recognition as
a Tufts Community Union (TCU) student group over alleged
discriminatory clauses in the group’s constitutional requirements for
its leaders.

TCF leadership says the group plans to appeal the decision.

The group’s Vision and Planning Team (VPT) failed to make revisions
to
their governing document that would bring it in line with the TCU
Constitution’s non-discriminatory clause, Judiciary Chair Adam Sax, a
senior, said.

As an unrecognized group, TCF will lose the right to use the Tufts
name in its title or at any activities, schedule events or reserve
university space through the Office for Campus Life and request and
receive funding allocated by the TCU Treasury, Sax said.

TCF is the Tufts chapter of InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA, an
evangelical Christian mission on college campuses across the country,
and also has ties to the university Chaplaincy.

The group had been operating in a state of suspended recognition
after
the Judiciary found that the group’s constitution excluded students
from applying to leadership positions based on their beliefs. The
clauses in question require that any TCF member who wishes to apply
for a leadership role must adhere to a series of tenets called a
Basis
of Faith, or eight “basic Biblical truths of Christianity.”

The Judiciary last month recommended that TCF move the belief-based
leadership requirements from the constitution’s bylaws, which are
legally binding, to its mission statement, which is not.

By the first week of October, TCF had not submitted any amendments,
so
Sax set a deadline of Oct. 18 for the group to do so.

“It was long enough for the [Judiciary] to say, ‘This is something
that needs to start getting done,’” Sax said.

The VPT solicited feedback from TCF members and submitted a proposal
for a new draft to be reviewed by the Judiciary. The revised
constitution, among other changes, shifted a clause requiring leaders
to follow the Basis of Faith to the constitution’s opening article
and
reworded several clauses in the article on leadership selection.

After reviewing the revised constitution, the Judiciary found that
the
clauses about leadership selection still excluded students who did
not
share a certain belief system, Sax said. TCF decided to accept
derecognition rather than continue to revise the document.

“In the end, we felt we couldn’t satisfy their suggestions,” senior
Elaine Kim, a member of the VPT, said.

The group has ten days to appeal its derecognition, according to Sax.
It must file paperwork with the Committee on Student Life (CSL)
requesting that a panel of students and faculty re-examine TCF’s
recognition status and either uphold or strike down the Judiciary’s
decision.

“We’re deciding to appeal this decision because we feel like just the
purpose of our organization is to...encourage understanding and
celebration of each belief [in the Basis of Faith], and the best way
to fulfill that purpose is to have leaders that are centered on and
unified by these beliefs,” Kim said.

“We feel like we have the right to be selective on the basis of
belief
for our leaders since we’re a student group that is trying to
encourage understanding about a faith-based set of beliefs,” she
added...

It is a familiar process for TCF, as the Judiciary derecognized the
group in 2000 after a student alleged that she had been denied a
leadership role because of her sexual orientation. TCF appealed to
the
CSL, which reversed the decision and reinstated the group’s
recognition.

Kim said that while she cannot predict the outcome of the planned
appeal to the CSL, TCF will continue to exist as a student group
based
in the Chaplaincy should its derecognition be upheld.

“We don’t know what the results are going to be but we’ll continue to
read the Bible and pray together,” she said.
------------------------------------------

So let's actually discuss what DID happen!

It was NOT the University's Administration that "banned" the Tufts
Christian Fellowship. It's was the Student Goverment there, the Tuft
Community Union, which determined the group would no longer be
*recognized* (NOT banned).

The Judiciary of the Tufts Community Union - the *student* government
at Tufts -- found that the Tufts Christian Fellowship requirement
that
student leaders adhere to "basic biblical truths of Christianity" was
a illegal violation of the Constitution of the TCU.

Because of this, the group was NOT banned; instead it became
"unrecognized" by the Tuft Community Union. It *also* has the right
to appeal this decision.

This is basically the same principles and proceedures that are in our
own Constitution of the United States of America.

At Tufts, the Tufts Community Union, its student goverment (federal
goverment) judicial system (its court system) found that the Tufts
Christian Fellowship, a member-group's (a state's) constitution
violated the TCU's Constitution.

Thus just as our own US Constitution over-rules any state's
constitution, so it is that the TCU's Constitution over-rules any
member-group's constitution.

Let's know some other things. First, this *was* a issue of legality,
not simply a violation of rules, but of law. Second, the TCU
suggested to the Tufts Christian Fellowship how the group might
change
it's constitution to comply with the Student Goverment's
Constitution. The Fellowship *failed* to do this.

This was a clear case of discrimination -- and THAT discrimination
was
BY the *Tufts Christian Fellowship". Because the Felllowship
*failed*
to change that discrimiatory aspect of it's constitution -- which
conflicted with the Student Govement's Constution -- the group will
no
longer be recognized (NOT banned) at Tufts.

The issue here had NOTHING to do with the *religious* nature of this
group, but rather that a group's constitution *discriminated* in a
manner that violated the Student Goverment's Constitution -- and
this was found illegal by it's Judiciary.

I wonder what Michael JONES' reaction would had been if a "Tufts
Muslim
Fellowship's" constitution that required any "TMF" member who wished
to apply for a leadership role must adhere to Islamic law (Sharia)
had
been found to have been discriminatory and the "Tufts Muslim
Fellowship" was then no longer recognized by the Tufts Community
Union.

Hmm.
Sylvia
2012-11-07 13:57:16 UTC
Permalink
Hi

you may find more information at http://www.topbibleverses.com/ when
evaluating the christian;
As a consequence, someone may decrease the penance of the church in a rapid manner when
evaluating the christian;
For the moment, it is mandatory to emphasize the foundation of the church in a rapid manner;
As a drawback, you can find some ideas at http://sourceforge.net/projects/clockloop/ when
evaluating the christian;
Now this scripture sample is appropriate
Simon Peter, a servant and apostle of
Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained a like precious faith with us in the
righteousness of our God and the Saviour
3 seeing that his divine power
hath granted unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through
the knowledge of him that called us by his own glory and virtue;
8 For if
these things are yours and abound, they make you to be not idle nor
unfruitful unto the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.
12 Wherefore I
shall be ready always to put you in remembrance of these things, though ye
know them, and are established in the truth which is with you.

When considering the christian , you should also try:
http://www.mynewsreader.com/18764/christian%2Bchurch/
http://www.mynewsreader.com/19047/church%2Bchristian/
http://oneinjesus.info/2012/03/the-future-of-the-churches-of-christ/
http://oneinjesus.info/recommended-church-of-christ-congregations/
http://internationalcongregations.net/asia.html
http://wesleyananglican.blogspot.com/

May The Lord be with you

Loading...