best chinese MBA programs

[Beatrice Humperdink]

My company is interested in sending some of our chinese employees to
take some MBA courses. Which are the top chinese business schools for finance
and accounting?
BH
http://groups.google.com/group/equityvalue/browse_frm/thread/eeff3a94...
Humperdick,
the best Chinese School for MBA course is the
University of Nottingham in Ningpo ,
south of Shanghai

So the best chinese biz school has a british name?!
Chinese must worship those british colonialists, no?
.

[mark]

Subject: Re: best chinese MBA programs
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,alt.accounting,soc.college

My company is interested in sending some of our chinese employees to
take some MBA courses. Which are the top chinese business schools for
finance and accounting?
BH
http://groups.google.com/group/equityvalue/browse_frm/thread/eeff3a94..
.
Humperdick,
the best Chinese School for MBA course is the
University of Nottingham in Ningpo ,
south of Shanghai

So the best chinese biz school has a british name?!
Chinese must worship those british colonialists, no?

Or just smart enough to learn from those that have proven themselves
sucessful?

[Beatrice Humperdink]

Or just smart enough to learn from those that have proven themselves sucessful?

if they want to do that, they should immitate american B schools.
everybody knows british B schools are second rate and desperately
trying to play catch up to American schools. dumbass chinese copying
the losers.

[Komin]

Humperdick ,
you are exactly right ,

Chinese copy the 2nd rate B school from the Brit- s.

because Chinese management is not top rate ,
there are too many corruptions and nepotism inside the Chinese
companies .

[mark]

Subject: Re: best chinese MBA programs
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,alt.accounting,soc.college

Or just smart enough to learn from those that have proven themselves sucessful?

if they want to do that, they should immitate american B schools.
everybody knows british B schools are second rate and desperately
trying to play catch up to American schools. dumbass chinese copying
the losers.

And yet when you look at international results, students from the USA score
significantly below the OECD average.

Hong Kong on the other hand scores very respectably, as do Japan, South
Korea, Finland, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada.

The Brit's might not be as good as these countries, but compared to the USA
they are gold.

The USA's education system is an international joke.

[David Ames]

Post by mark
The USA's education system is an international joke.

Well, this is news to me. As an American, I was not aware we had a
"system" of education.

David Ames

[Beatrice Humperdink]

Post by mark
The USA's education system is an international joke.

if America's universities are such a joke, why do all the
internationals flock
to America for their phd? if they can't get into American school, then
they have to
settle for Oxford or some other outdated school.

[PAT-RIK]

Because in Oxford you can pay to get your degree!

[Beatrice Humperdink]

oxford is just a public school in a small country, no different from
Illinois or Georgia State U

[Goodmooneeman]

Oxford is a place where you study about the past ,

past tense only .
There is no future in Oxford .

[PAT-RIK]

Oh, sorry I mean in Oxford you can NOT pay for your degree like in
Standford or Harward.

Last world university ranking from November 2005 TOP 10:
1 Harvard University, US
2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, US
3 Cambridge University, UK
4 Oxford University, UK
5 Stanford University, US
6 University of California, Berkeley, US
7 Yale University, US
8 California Institute of Technology, US
9 Princeton University, US
10 Ecole Polytechnique, France

Regards,
Pat.

[Ira Humperdink MD]

Sawwry, buddy, but your ranking appears to have been done by europeans
and reflect inaccurate european biases. Here is the true ranking
according to top US magazines and newspapers, including NY Times, based
on academic research:

Last world university ranking from November 2005 TOP 10:
1. Stanford University, US
2 Harvard University, US
3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, US
4 University of California, Berkeley, US
7 Yale University, US
8 California Institute of Technology, US
9 Columbia University, US
10 University of California, Los Angelos

[PAT-RIK]

How come that if a ranking is made by europeans it has a bias and when
it's made by americans it doesn't have a bias? Btw. your ranking is a
ranking of TOP U.S. universities, not TOP world universities.

Btw.
I don't see what makes Stanford the best university in your ranking. I
had three teachers from Standford and they were good, but not top
class. Unlike the scholars for Harvard and MIT.

Cambride Univeristy is undoubtly a top clas by any standards. PaPaPeng
just posted a ranking where Cambridge university is number two.

In terms of reliablity go to google and spearch for world univeristy
ranking. Google is programed to list most quoted rankings first, and my
ranking is no. 1 in google. Of course it does not say everything, but
it just another indicator.

Don't be U.S. biased.

[Ira Humperdink MD]

your stupid ranking doesn't mean c*nt. when they call it a "world"
rank,
they have to stick some token none-American university in the ranking
just to
make it APPEAR like it contains some non-American universities. but
everybody knows that the non-American universities are included just as
tokens.

if cambrige is so great, how many nobel prizes did they win lately?
how many publications in the top research journals do they have
compared, say, to a to 10 US university?

british universities cannot compete against US universities because
they pay low. no researcher who can get higher paying job in US would
ever settle for cambridge.

[PAT-RIK]

Post by Ira Humperdink MD
if cambrige is so great, how many nobel prizes did they win lately?
how many publications in the top research journals do they have
compared, say, to a to 10 US university

University of Oxford has until today: 47 nobel prize holders
Univeristy of Cambridge has until today: 81 nobel prize holders

http://www.cam.ac.uk/cambuniv/nobelprize.html
http://www.ox.ac.uk/aboutoxford/awardwinners/nobel.shtml

Love,
Pat.

[Rosco]

And Ira Humperdick MD is concerned about recent Nobel prizes:

Harvard: 1998 - 2005 - 6 Nobel winners
Cambridge: 1998 - 2005 - 9 Nobel winners
Oxford: 1998 -2005 - 8 Nobel winners

You lose Humperdick.

Post by PAT-RIK

Post by Ira Humperdink MD
if cambrige is so great, how many nobel prizes did they win lately?
how many publications in the top research journals do they have
compared, say, to a to 10 US university

University of Oxford has until today: 47 nobel prize holders
Univeristy of Cambridge has until today: 81 nobel prize holders
http://www.cam.ac.uk/cambuniv/nobelprize.html
http://www.ox.ac.uk/aboutoxford/awardwinners/nobel.shtml
Love,
Pat.

[mrs. eliza humperdink]

yeah, oxford and cambridge won most of those nobel prizes 50-100 years
ago.
count how many they won in last 10 years and compare that to stanford
and harvard!

[Komin]

If you are asian students , stick to America , and don' t go to the
UK.

That is why there is a drop in the number of Chinese Students going to
the UK for universities .

Asian students have better chances at American or Canadaian
Universities .

UK always exhibits the past and the UK always stays in the past , like
racial discriminations , just like the Commonwealth , it is the racial
discriminations which killed the British Commnowealth .

[PAT-RIK]

Harvard: 1998 - 2005 - 6 Nobel winners
Cambridge: 1998 - 2005 - 9 Nobel winners
Oxford: 1998 -2005 - 8 Nobel winners

[Ira Humperdink MD]

Post by Rosco
Cambridge: 1998 - 2005 - 9 Nobel winners
Oxford: 1998 -2005 - 8 Nobel winners

read the fine print, buddy. Those 17 nobel prize winners all did their
original research 20-40 years ago, BEFORE 1980. After 1980s, its all
silicon valley, ebay, yahoo, Stanford.

[PAT-RIK]

Yeah right. And all those American winners did their research in before
1980 too. You failed to american universities where any better then
those from UK. Maybe in 10 years from now.

[Ira Humperdink MD]

given a chioce between living in sunny stanford compared to dreary
ox-cam, which young aspiring nobel prize winner would choose go to
england????

[PAT-RIK]

Well, I think that people like me and you like have party on a sunny
beach, but people like aspring nobel prize winner like to stay in
dreary library of ox-cam. But I agree with you, it's just that at the
moment University of Cambridge is not that bad, but could happen later.

[Ira Humperdink MD]

But I agree with you, it's just that at the moment University of Cambridge is not that bad, but could happen later.

yes, but rankings are competitive, and the University of arizona are
not that
bad either. What makes you think ox-cam is better than arizona just
because ox-cam is older?
arizona won some recent nobel prizes.

[PAT-RIK]

Well, this is the punch line:

Briliant students that want to be Nobel prize holders will go to
Harward and Stanford because they like sunny beach and great education
and they love America and all that comes with it.

Very bad lausy students that could not make it to Stanford or other
great American schools (like Arizona) will be so unlucky and they will
go to schools like University of Oxford and Cambridge University.

After few years of education: University of Oxford or Cambridge
University will turn more nobel prize winners out of lausy students
than Harward and Stanford out of brilliant students.

Don't get me wrong. I love America. And I would love to be a Princeton
graduate. :-)

Harvard: 1998 - 2005 - 6 Nobel winners
Cambridge: 1998 - 2005 - 9 Nobel winners
Oxford: 1998 -2005 - 8 Nobel

[Ira Humperdink MD]

don't see what makes Stanford the best university in your ranking. I had three teachers from Standford and they were good, but not top class.

1) who built silicon valley, google, ebay, intel, and yahoo?
2) research is the main signature of greatness -- not teaching dumbass
undergrads like yourself.

[Komin]

If you want to study for the future ,
you better go to the USA,
and don' t go to the UK .
If you want to know about the past , and
stay in the past , the go to the UK ,
especially Oxford, then you will remain in the past .

the future of this world is in the USA ,
with Japan following the USA.
If you want to remain in the past , then
go to the Brits,

The future of Europe is in Germany and in France ,
with the Swiss following behind these two, so if you want
to look forward to the future in Europe ,
then for to study in Germany France or Switzerland .

If you want to stay in the Past ,
the go to the UK, the UK will always remain in the past ,
just like the Commonwealth meeting in Malta now,
everything that associates with the Brits, is always in the Past .

[Ira Humperdink MD]

i wish chinese can speak english as well as the indians. next to the
japanese, who are constantly silent and scraping, the chinese must be
the world's worst TAs at american schools. speake englisheeee!

[Komin]

Oxford is still living in the past ,the

whole of the UK is still living in the past .

That is why the US is taking the world .

American Universities are more open to the future world than the Brit
s.

With a degree from a Brit University , you will have problem finding
works .

[Beatrice Humperdink]

nd yet when you look at international results, students from the USA score significantly below the OECD average.

what's oecd? americans do. chinese take test and brag about scores.
who cares about scores. just look at what happen to your country when
you
waste your energy taking worthless tests.

[mark]

Subject: Re: best chinese MBA programs
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,alt.accounting,soc.college

Post by mark
nd yet when you look at international results, students from the USA
score significantly below the OECD average.

what's oecd? americans do.

Actually, if you look at the US economy, you'll find that Americans "do"
less and less. Most industries are being farmed out to other countries,
particularly in the developing world.

chinese take test and brag about scores.

Some brag about scores, some cheat, but looking at actual results, it looks
to me that China is beating the USA at it's own game. The result counts.

who cares about scores. just look at what happen to your country when
you
waste your energy taking worthless tests.

My own country is doing very well thanks.